QUALITY OF WOOD AND BARK OF EUCALYPTUS CLONES CULTIVATED FOR MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD PRODUCTION

Main Article Content

Stéffany Lima Araujo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9318-2610
Gabriela Goldner Gimenez
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2616-7677
Luana Bento Protázio
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0307-913X
Thayanne Caroline Castor Neto
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9740-1665
Daniela Andrade Neves de Rezende
Daniella Flávia Said Heid Schettini Silva
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6390-7116
Maria Naruna Félix de Almeida
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6360-7780
João Gabriel Missia da Silva
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3714-2745
Graziela Baptista Vidaurre
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9285-7105

Abstract

Background: Although bark is often considered undesirable in industrial applications, it is an integral part of the tree and is always present. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of wood and bark of Eucalyptus clones cultivated for medium density fiberboard production.


Results: Bark proportion ranged from 8.22% to 10.25%, and heartwood from 26.98% to 36.16%. The basic density of wood ranged from 455 to 502 kg·m⁻³, wood with bark from 447 to 483 kg·m⁻³, and bark from 342 to 368 kg·m⁻³. Bark showed higher extractive (8.59% to 13.21%) and holocellulose (67.70% to 71.43%) contents and lower lignin content (18.20% to 19.99%) compared to wood. pH values ranged from 4.40 to 4.75, being higher in bark. Ash content was significantly higher in bark (1.64% to 2.21%) than in wood (0.18% to 0.29%). The inclusion of bark in wood did not significantly affect density, pH, or chemical composition, indicating its technical feasibility for MDF panel production.


Conclusion: The inclusion of bark in the wood of Eucalyptus clones did not cause significant changes in basic density, chemical composition, pH, or ash content, confirming its technical feasibility for MDF panel production. The most affected properties due to the presence of bark were extractive and ash contents.

Article Details

Section
Article
Author Biographies

Luana Bento Protázio, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Thayanne Caroline Castor Neto, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Daniela Andrade Neves de Rezende, Dexco S.A., Private Company, 17120-000, Agudos, SP, Brazi

Dexco S.A., Private Company, 17120-000, Agudos, SP, Brazi

Maria Naruna Félix de Almeida, Federal University of Para, Faculty of Forestry Engineering, 68371-043, Altamira, PA, Brazil

Federal University of Para, Faculty of Forestry Engineering, 68371-043, Altamira, PA, Brazil

João Gabriel Missia da Silva, ¹Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Graziela Baptista Vidaurre, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil

Federal University of Espirito Santo, Departament of Forestry and Wood Sciences, 29550-000, Jerônimo Monteiro, ES, Brazil